Adept Economics, in conjunction with Queensland Economic Advocacy Solutions (QEAS) have undertaken a review of the emerging business case for the safe prioritised removal of asbestos. The review involved a literature review and summary of findings from stakeholder consultations on the topic. If lifecycle benefits exceed costs, then the upfront investment in asbestos removal, which can be substantial, would be worthwhile. 

ASEA gifts and benefits register 2014-2019.

Under Senate Order 192 of 2001, agencies are required to list all contracts entered into which are to the value of $100,000 or greater.

The Senate Order is produced at the conclusion of two reporting periods (period) each year, Financial Year and Calendar Year.

Our Annual Operational and Corporate Plan sets out the Agency's priorities and key activities for a 12-month period.

This fact sheet contains information on the dangers of chrysotile (white) asbestos, the movement for a global ban and common questions relating to chrysotile asbestos.

During the life of NSP 2014 – 2018 a total of 126 activities were reported as completed and over sixty activities will continue into the next phase of the plan, demonstrating active engagement in the awareness and management of asbestos. This final report highlights some of the achievements made and draws out the key elements of the work done over the last five years that were critical to achieving progress against the NSP 2014–2018

This fact sheet contains information, in Vietnamese, on the dangers of chrysotile (white) asbestos, the movement for a global ban and common questions relating to chrysotile asbestos.

This fact sheet contains information, in Tagalog, on the dangers of chrysotile (white) asbestos, the movement for a global ban and common questions relating to chrysotile asbestos.